February 8, 2010 by John Knight
Politicians from both sides of the aisle have been caught using the word ‘retarded’ in a demeaning way over the past several months. Of all people, those who have their words scrutinized should know better.
But I’m not writing today to pile on – I know my own heart well enough to know that while certain words are off-limits, my heart still harbors evil against others.
I’ve been thinking about how to address the issue of language and the condition of my heart. The church covenant I entered into at Bethlehem includes several helpful statements. For example, here is statement four of the six that make up the entire covenant:
We further engage to watch over one another in brotherly love; to remember one another in prayer; to aid one another in sickness and distress; to cultivate Christian sympathy in feeling and courtesy in speech; to be slow to take offense, but always ready for reconciliation and mindful of the rules of our Savior to secure it without delay.
I know the Church Covenant is specifically addressing the community of members at Bethlehem. But the principles of being ’slow to take offense’ and ‘always ready for reconciliation’ are worth striving for as one who clings to a savior who sacrificed his very life for sinners like me.
Plus, I know that God has already assigned special protection to those with disabilities:
You shall not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block before the blind, but you shall fear your God: I am the Lord. Leviticus 19:14
So, let us not demean politicians who use language carelessly. Yes, such things need to be addressed because they do harm others, like my own boy. But their words are only pointing to the condition of their hearts. We do them no favors by merely encouraging them to hide that condition rather than turning their trust to our savior.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
February 3, 2010 by theworksofgod
Eric Mason delivered a powerful message yesterday morning at the DG Conference for Pastors. His theme was suffering, sanctification and joy.
He speaks with credibility. He has experienced suffering in his own life and family. And he loves Jesus.
Here is a quote from my notes that I’m still chewing on:
The purpose of suffering in sanctification is not to destroy you but to develop you.
Listen or watch here. I highly recommend it.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
February 2, 2010 by John Knight
The pastors have showed up for the Desiring God Conference for Pastors, along with a few men who just decided to come along with them.
And like last year, I heard some hard stories. These faithful men carry a lot on their shoulders. Thankfully, they don’t carry it by themselves. I heard many references to scripture, including:
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to comfort those who are in any affliction, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God. 2 Corinthians 1:3-4
That’s the sort of pastor God has made ready for families like ours!
Posted in Scripture | Leave a Comment »
February 1, 2010 by John Knight

More than 1300 pastors are gathering for the 2010 Desiring God Conference for Pastors starting this afternoon. I love this gathering of men! I think I can summarize why in two statements:
- The pastors with the greatest impact on me and my family are men who know the word and apply it appropriately, carefully, and confidently. I know from past experience that the pastors attending the conference will receive good teaching and encouragement in this area.
- The pastors with the greatest impact on me and my family love Jesus with a passion and long to develop those affections in others. I know those affections will be encouraged at this conference!
The result: when families like mine show up at church, we are met by leaders who know and trust the promises and character of God and anticipate that God will provide for all our needs. I would love to see hundreds of additional churches be ready for families like mine!
I also know they are all still men, tempted greatly to sin and surrounded by a sea of discouragement, sadness and difficulty in their churches. The enemy of their faith will target every weakness they have because he hates faithful pastors who trust in God alone and not in themselves.
So, please pray for all those gathering these next three days. David Clifford, Manager for Events and Customer Service at Desiring God emailed us last week with these prayer requests:
PRAY
- Please pray for the men who will be coming and the multitude of needs that will be represented.
- Pray for God to strengthen marriages, for the churches that are experiencing difficultly, and for men under spiritual depression and afflictions.
- Pray for revival within those churches that are represented and a clear proclamation of the gospel to go forth from these pulpits.
- Pray that we serve them well and in the full strength of the Lord.
There is a battle raging and “in all these things we are more than conquers through him who loved us.” (Romans 8:37)
Amen, David.
Thank you for praying.
Posted in News | 1 Comment »
January 29, 2010 by John Knight
This headline in the Telegraph says it all: Haiti ‘faces amputee generation’.
In another article, The Miami Herald reported that Healing Hands for Haiti, the only prosthetic limb manufacturer in Port-au-Prince was destroyed.
Does anyone know of agencies preparing to serve the thousands of newly disabled people of Haiti? Please add a comment if you do.
And let us all continue to pray for them and support the agencies providing immediate relief.
Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »
Abortion is about marketing?
February 9, 2010 by John Knight
Frances Kissling, the former president of Catholics for Choice and Kate Michelman, the former president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, wrote an opinion piece in the Washington Post a week before what is now known as the Tim Tebow Super Bowl ad was aired.
Titled “What Tim Tebow’s Super Bowl ad can teach the pro-choice movement,” they seem to believe that the leaders in the pro-life movement are just better at messaging than those who support abortion. For example:
People want to be inspired, and abortion is as tough and courageous a decision as is the decision to continue a pregnancy. But the conversation is being led by Focus on the Family and its quarterback ambassador. It’s a high-profile example of the savvy way the antiabortion movement has tailored its message. . .
Women’s and choice groups responding to the Tebow ad should take a page from the Focus on the Family playbook. Erin Matson, the National Organization for Women’s new vice president, called the Tebow spot “hate masquerading as love.” That kind of comment may play well in the choice choir, but to others, it makes no sense, at best; at worst, it’s seen as the kind of stridency that reinforces the view that pro-choice simply means pro-abortion.
Yes, I would agree it reinforces that view.
The editorial struck me as odd. Without any sense of irony or even acknowledging a difference in principles, they talk about the abhorrent practice of partial-birth abortion, the numbers of abortions in 1989, the advances that science has allowed in watching the development of a baby in the womb, how Americans increasingly consider themselves pro-life, and even quote an African-American football player equating Roe v. Wade with the shameful Dred Scott Decision of the Supreme Court in 1857. And Frances Kissling and Kate Michelman are for legalized abortion! Talk about a problem with marketing.
They close their editorial with this paragraph:
So here’s our Super Bowl strategy for the choice movement. We’d go with a 30-second spot, too. The camera focuses on one woman after another, posed in the situations of daily life: rushing out the door in the morning for work, flipping through a magazine, washing dishes, teaching a class of sixth-graders, wheeling a baby stroller. Each woman looks calmly into the camera and describes her different and successful choice: having a baby and giving it up for adoption, having an abortion, having a baby and raising it lovingly. Each one being clear that making choices isn’t easy, but that life without tough choices doesn’t exist.
Of course life includes difficult choices; that isn’t even an argument worth raising. This is not a marketing campaign. And I notice there are some important female voices not included in the above suggestions from Frances Kissling and Kate Michelman: the more than 500,000 baby girls who were aborted last year.
Part of the controversy, though it did not end up in the ads that I saw, was the fact that Pam Tebow chose to continue her pregnancy with Tim even though there was a risk of fetal deformity. Pam Tebow chose the better, harder path – and ended up with a Heisman Trophy-winning son.
Now, 23 years later, doctors can diagnose more accurately and at earlier stages of development many types of disabilities in the womb. Going forward, more women will know with greater certainty that the unborn child they carry has a disability. And we must still make the case that having that child is the better, harder path to take.
Posted in commentary | Leave a Comment »